|
Prefer to read (or listen to) this newsletter in your browser? Click here. š” The Big Idea: The Suffering is OptionalLast month, I was listening to Gabby Beckford give her talk at Craft + Commerce, and she asked the question: If you could burn the rulebook, what would you change? Iāve been brewing on this for the last couple of weeks. And I think Iāve got an answer: I would remove the suffering from the creative process. To some, that may sound blasphemous. There are lots of famous books that portray creativity as a form of warfare. Maybe the most famous is The War of Art by Steven Pressfield, which says: The artist must be like [a] Marine. He has to know how to be miserable. He has to love being miserable. He has to take pride in being more miserable than any soldier or swabbie or jet jockey. Because this is war, baby. And war is hell. For a long time, Iāve lived as though this was true. But listening to Gabbyās talk, I had to ask myself: What if it isnāt? In this newsletter, I want to unpack the idea of delusional confidence and how it's critical if you want to do your best creative work. The Lie I Believed for YearsOver the last couple of months, Iāve been thinking a lot about who I can help and the transformation I can provide. Iām realizing that teaching people how to use Obsidian is cool, but what really lights me up is helping deep thinkers use PKM principles to publish their ideas online and do their best creative work. The reason? For a long time, I didnāt think I was creative. It all started when I was in college. I liked to write songs on my guitar, but then I would hear a song on the radio and realize that Iād ripped off a melody line or chord progression from something that already existed. Other people seem to have this innate ability to pull a fully formed song out of thin air, and I just couldnāt do it. So I actually said, out loud, āI guess Iām just not creative.ā Then I read the book Steal Like an Artist by Austin Kleon, and it gave me hope. Austin described creativity as the collection and synthesis of the dots you collect. He explained that true artists simply connect pre-existing dots in ways that havenāt been done before. And with the realization that creativity is a simple formula, my limiting belief was destroyed, and I was free to create. When Gabby mentioned in her talk that āthe suffering is optional,ā it brought me back to that moment where I couldnāt see myself as creative. And it made me question what other limiting beliefs may be holding me back. Creating From a Place of AbundanceI shared not too long ago about my experience at The Growth Intensive where Darrell Vesterfelt & Corey Wilks helped me work through a lot of head trash Iāve been collecting for years. Corey kind of just tells it how it is, and at one point he told me: Youāre so concerned about not being successful that youāre guaranteeing that you wonāt be successful. Tough to hear, but 100% true. As I thought about why I get so focused on the negative, I realized itās because Iāve believed that creative work requires suffering, and I probably havenāt suffered enough to have earned success. After that, Darrell walked me through an exercise where I envisioned myself 6 months down the road after the conclusion of my most successful launch ever. In addition to the warm fuzzies, that exercise gave me the realization that my work is much better coming from a place of abundance. I realized that the imposter syndrome (and the anxiety that comes with it) is a signal that I can choose how to interpret. When I tried to avoid those feelings by playing it safe, I was actually prolonging the optional suffering. But when I recognize that trigger as a sign that Iām on the right path and doing work that really matters, Iām able to create from a place of confidence, and the results are exponentially better. The takeaway is this: If I want to provide transformation, I need to create from a place of abundance. Recognizing this completely changes the way I show up, and frees me to do my best creative work. The exact thing I want to help others do. Delusional ConfidenceGabby Beckford has a name for this posture: delusional confidence. I know how that sounds. The first time the phrase surfaced, it felt like something I shouldnāt say out loud ā like I was handing myself permission to be arrogant and skip the part where you actually earn the right to feel good about your work. But thatās just the old rulebook talking. Delusional confidence isnāt pretending youāre better than you are. Itās deciding your idea is worth sharing before you have any proof that it is. Itās shipping the thing before the anxiety gives you the all-clear. And letās be real, the anxiety is never going to give you the all-clear. For most of my creative life, I had the order backwards. I waited to feel confident, and then Iād make stuff. Case in point: my most recent YouTube video on How I Run My Whole Life Out of Obsidian. Iāve been dragging my feet on this video for years because I didnāt feel qualified to make it. After recent events, I shipped it anyway. And it just happens to be the most successful video Iāve ever made. Confidence isnāt a permission slip somebody signs for you at the front office. You act first, and the confidence shows up later ā usually right around the time you notice the thing you were terrified of didnāt actually kill you. The ādelusionalā part is just the gap between doing the work and feeling like youāve earned it. So close the gap. Call it what it is: confidence you decided to feel a little early. Itās only delusional until it works. The Bottom Line: You Donāt Have to Earn the Right to Do Your Best Creative WorkFor years, I kept score, and the suffering was my scorecard. If I felt anxious, blocked, and convinced I wasnāt good enough, at least I was paying my dues. Someday the payoff would come. Thatās a rigged game. You can suffer forever and never decide youāve suffered enough. Gabby asked, āIf you could burn the rulebook, what would you change?ā Hereās the rule Iām burning: confidence must be earned through misery. Delusional confidence is how you burn it. Not waiting until youāve suffered enough to feel like you belong ā but deciding you belong and letting the work catch up. So hereās your permission: you donāt have to earn your way out of the suffering. You can just put down the rulebook. And when you do, youāll find what I found. Your best work was never waiting on the other side of the struggle. It was waiting on the other side of the permission. Thatās the transformation I want for you ā not less effort, but better work, created from abundance instead of scarcity. ā Mike |
A weekly newsletter where I help people apply values-based productivity principles and systems for personal growth, primarily using Obsidian. Subscribe if you want to make more of your notes and ideas.
Prefer to read (or listen to) this newsletter in your browser? Click here. š” The Big Idea: You donāt have a creativity problem. You have an idea portfolio problem. You might know David Perell as the creator of Write of Passage or the host of the How I Write podcast. But he also describes himself as an angel investor in companies focused on creators, productivity, and the future of education. Recently, he was on the Nathan Barry Show (How to Stand Out as a Writer in the Age of AI), where he...
Prefer to read (or listen to) this newsletter in your browser? Click here. š” The Big Idea: Before you let AI into your notes, make sure it knows the rules. My vault is over a decade of thinking. Book notes, sermon prep, podcast ideas, half-formed thoughts Iām still working out. Letting an AI loose in there can feel a little like handing a stranger the keys to my house. To be clear, I was never afraid that Claude would read my notes. I was worried it would change them. Those are my thoughts,...
Prefer to read (or listen to) this newsletter in your browser? Click here. š” The Big Idea: You didnāt lose your creativity. You were trained out of it. In the late 1960s, NASA had a real problem. They were trying to put a man on the Moon, something that had never been done before. To do so, they needed engineers and scientists who could solve problems no one had ever seen before. Being smart wasnāt enough. They needed to be inventive. So they commissioned a researcher named George Land to...